Peter Schweizer. · Rating details · 77 ratings · 12 reviews. In Makers and Takers you will discover why: * Seventy-one percent of conservatives say you have. In Makers and Takers you will discover why: * Seventy-one percent of conservatives say you have an obligation to care for a seriously injured. In Makers and Takers, a new volume by Peter Schweizer, a Hoover Institution research fellow, you will discover why.
|Published (Last):||15 May 2011|
|PDF File Size:||18.58 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||15.48 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
Apr 08, Brendan Steinhauser rated it it was amazing. According to these supposedly unbiased studies, conservatives are mean-spirited, greedy, selfish malcontents with authoritarian tendencies.
This is an excellent book to read everyone should read it. This book is well worth a read. But what do the facts show? Fifty-five percent of conservatives said yes versus only 20 percent of liberals. Rick Mercer Final Report. Want to Read saving….
Indeed, he shows that many of these claims actually apply more to liberals than conservatives. Please try again later. Schweizer cherry-picks his examples, but I can see why–we’ve been presented a “story” in this country that the progressive-left are the intelligent, reasonable, kind, loving and altruistic, while everyone who disagrees with them are barbaric, stupid, angry, mean, vicious and selfish.
Schweizer, using the latest data and research, exposes how, in general: For years scholars schweizeg constructed—and the media has pushed—elaborate theories designed to demonstrate that conservatives suffer from a host of personality defects and character flaws.
You can help Wikipedia by expanding it. Adorno, Foucault and the Critique of the West. Vierblij rated it did not like it Oct 01, Conservatives such as Ronald Reagan and Robert Bork have long argued that liberal policies promote social decay.
Peter Schweizer on Makers and Takers by Peter Schweizer on Free Online Video
This provides the quantification to prove it just ain’t so. In his myth-busting book, Makers and TakersSchweizer presents conclusive evidence that liberals are vastly different from conservatives, especially in morals and ethics.
Jan 11, Douglas Wilson rated it really liked it Shelves: Much as he did in his bestseller Do as I Say Not as I Dohe brings to light never-before-revealed facts that will upset conventional wisdom. How Europe Underdeveloped Africa. Profiles in Liberal Hypocrisy portrayed liberal icons and leaders in America as less virtuous than their conservative counterparts, Makers and Takers expands this thesis to the general populace, implying conservatives in general are more virtuous than liberals.
Far from the belief of a few cranks, prominent liberals from John Kenneth Galbraith to Hillary Clinton have succumbed to these prejudices. Pages to import images to Wikidata All stub articles.
Makers and Takers – Wikipedia
Ryan Hastings rated it really liked it Mar 31, Ashley rated it it was amazing Jan 02, Peter Schweizer has dug deep—through tax documents, scholarly data, primary opinion research surveys, and private records—and has discovered that these claims are a myth.
Fifty-five percent of conservatives said yes versus only 20 percent of liberals. In this short, generously spaced work Schweizer debunks the popular notion that liberals are better people than supposedly tight-fisted, hard-hearted, mentally unstable conservatives. Thanks for telling us about the problem.
Makers and Takers
Peter Schweizer has dug deep—through tax documents, scholarly data, primary opinion research surveys, and private records—and has discovered that these claims are a myth. The following is an interview with Peter Schweizer, author of the newly released Makers and Takers Doubleday, Jun 03, Pages Buy.
Jun 03, Pages. The American left prides itself on being superior to conservatives: Want to Read Currently Reading Read. For years scholars have constructed—and the media has pushed—elaborate theories designed to demonstrate that conservatives suffer from a host of personality defects and character flaws.
Anyone who has met more than one “liberal” or “conservative” ought to be able to take this ridiculous generalization to task, but it seems we rarely do, at least if one liste This was well-written and entertaining.
Indeed, he shows that many of these claims actually apply more to liberals schweizr conservatives. Profiles in Liberal Hypocrisy. The Day After the Revolution. This book is not yet featured on Listopia.
I bought this book after I read a fantastic review of it. Blood of the Liberals. Andrew J Ruggiero rated it liked it Mar 06,