Software companies which have been involved in a process improvement programme according to ISO/IEC are showing an increasing interest in the . INTERNATIONAL. STANDARD. ISO/IEC. Second edition. Information ISO’s member body in the country of the requester. ISO copyright. INTERNATIONAL. STANDARD. ISO/IEC. Second edition ISO/IEC exemplar software life cycle Process Assessment.
|Published (Last):||12 November 2010|
|PDF File Size:||17.33 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||19.83 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
Assessors write down the assessment results and notes supporting the assessment judgment. Views Read Edit View history. Retrieved from ” https: In addition there are methods available that adapt its use to various contexts. The 7th part is currently in an advanced Final Draft Standard form  and work has started on part 8.
ISO/IEC – Wikipedia
Computer programming Requirements engineering Software deployment Software design Software maintenance Software testing Systems analysis Formal methods. List of International Electrotechnical Commission standards. Work on extending the value of capability determination includes a method called Practical Process Profiles – which uses risk as the determining factor in setting target process profiles.
For a successful assessment, the assessor must have a suitable level of the relevant skills and experience. This also enables suppliers to identify gaps between their current capability and the level required by a potential customer, and to undertake improvement to achieve the contract requirements i.
The international standard defines nine process attributes:.
The list of processes covered grew to cover six business areas: The assessor assesses this 155045- using his expert judgment against a process’s base practices and the capability dimension’s generic practices in the process rating step. Safety extension van Loon, H. With new parts being published, the process categories will expand, particularly for IT service process categories and enterprise process categories.
An organization considering outsourcing software development needs to have a good understanding of the capability of potential suppliers to deliver. There exist several assessment tools. In a few cases, there may be feedback requiring further assessment before a final process rating is made.
This section’s factual accuracy may be compromised due to out-of-date information. This was proposed from Japan when the TRs were published at Following this improvement programme is not mandatory and several alternative improvement programmes exist. The isk of processes is measured using process attributes. Computer science Computer engineering Project management Risk management Systems engineering.
The simplest comprise paper-based tools. The assessor validates this data to ensure it is accurate and completely covers the assessment scope. Process rating requires some exercising of expert judgment on the part of the assessor and this is the reason that there are requirements on assessor qualifications and competency. From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia. Articles needing cleanup from January All pages needing cleanup Cleanup tagged articles with a reason field from January Wikipedia pages needing cleanup from January Articles with obsolete information from October All Wikipedia articles in need of updating All articles with unsourced statements Articles with unsourced statements from May ISO standards by standard number.
There are five general and industry models in oso.
Target process profiles are particularly important in contexts where the organization for example, a government department is required to accept the cheapest qualifying vendor. This page was last edited on 12 Juneat isp The process assessment model in part 6 is based on the process reference model for systems: This has been for several reasons:.
The issued standard now specifies oso measurement framework and can use different process reference models. This is an elaboration of the process reference model PRM provided by the process lifecycle standards.
January Learn how and when to remove this template message. In general, they are laid out to incorporate the assessment model indicators, including the base practice indicators and generic practice indicators.
The process assessment model PAM is the detailed model used for an actual 15504-55. Data modeling Enterprise architecture Functional specification Modeling language Orthogonality Programming paradigm Software Software archaeology Software architecture Software configuration management Software development methodology Software development process Software quality Software quality assurance Software verification and validation Structured analysis.
The rating is based upon evidence collected against the practice indicators, which demonstrate fulfillment of the 15504-5 attribute.
The specific isso is: There are a limited number of computer based tools that present the indicators and allow users to enter the assessment judgment and notes in formatted screens, as well as automate the collated assessment result i.
An assessor can collect data on a process by various means, including interviews with persons performing the process, collecting documents and quality records, and collecting statistical process data.
The organization can determine a target capability for suppliers, based on the organization’s needs, and then assess suppliers against a set of target process profiles that specify this target capability.
The first versions of the standard focused exclusively on software development processes. The initial International Standard was recreated in 5 parts. This article may require cleanup to meet Wikipedia’s quality standards.
Each process attribute consists of one or more generic practices, which are further elaborated into practice indicators to aid assessment performance. The actual method is not specified in the standard although 15540-5 standard places requirements on the method, method developers and assessors using the method.
The process rating is then presented as a preliminary finding to the sponsor and preferably also to the persons assessed to ensure that they agree that the assessment is accurate.