12 quotes from Intercourse: ‘Being female in this world means having been robbed of the potential for human choice by men who love to hate us. One does d . INTERCOURSE by Andrea Dworkin. by Giney Villar. Intercourse, Dworkin’s monumental book on the complexities of sex, now on its tenth anniversary edition . Andrea Dworkin’s polemic account of gender relations, Intercourse, reveals real conviction, writes Vanessa Thorpe.
|Genre:||Health and Food|
|Published (Last):||13 February 2013|
|PDF File Size:||2.19 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||18.72 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
IntercourseDworkin’s monumental book on the complexities of sex, now on its tenth anniversary edition, remains as forceful today as when it first appeared in In her new preface Dworkin describes her book as “…a book that moves through the sexed world of dominance and submission…” and rightly so. In this book, the author questions and challenges the value and meaning that men and women attach to Intercourse.
While it is “easy” to read having been written in a lucid, scholarly manner without being highbrow, the book is difficult to comprehend.
Intercourse compels its readers to rip open their bodies and minds and examine them under the stark illumination Dworkin beams. It is disturbing light, and she makes no inteercourse for casting it. Dworkin stops being female in this dorkin and suggests that all women must begin to stop being women as constructed by men, for their integrity and survival. It can be interpreted in many ways.
This is what the book exactly aims to do. To pose questions, spur action and in the author’s own words, “Intercourse is search and assertion, passion and fury; and its form—no less that its content—deserves critical scrutiny and respect.
The book is divided into three parts. The first part, “Intercourse in a Man-made World” illustrates the way men perceive women and themselves, as they sexually relate to women. In the section “Repulsion,” Dworkin tells of the repulsion men have against women’s bodies, sexual intercourse and their unbridled desires, as exemplified by Tolstoy’s life and works. In Tolstoy’s The Kreutzer Sonataa man kills his wife to end his own torment and pain about the possibility of losing control over her.
The man reasons that with her death, his wife could no longer be capable of defying him, and he did not have to bear the responsibility of subjugating her and desiring her.
Dworkin asserts that men are obsessed with protecting their own vulnerability and they use women to draw attention away from this “nakedness. Sexual intercourse is likened to being “Skinless” where men and women merge and lose boundaries to become one flesh- male flesh.
Intercourse has also been understood as a form of possession. Women are being penetrated and thus conquered and dominated as objects. In so doing, men possess women but both experience the man being fworkin.
In the process, women essentially lose themselves when they are taken over by men. This is necessary for intercourse to be successful. Amazingly, men are not possessed even if they are literally enveloped sndrea women during the sexual act. Women have been constructed by this type of sexuality.
As the author puts it, “This being marked by sexuality requires a cold capacity to use and a pitiful vulnerability that comes from having been used.
Thus, male possession has become an affirmation of desirability, womanhood and existence. In part two, “The Female Condition,” Dworkin talks about the situation of women and the way men maintain female subordination.
In her first example, Dworkin is the relationship between virginity and power as illustrated in the life of Joan of Arc. Joan of Arc, champion of France against the English, repudiated the way women were constructed and fought intercouese the English until her capture by the Burgundians. For Joan of Arc, virginity was “a passage, not a permanent condition,” an act of integrity and not a retreat from life.
Her virginity and military prowess challenged patriarchal powers and for a time succeeded. She was dwoorkin of more than seventy crimes dwlrkin of which was wearing male clothes. The Inquisitors went out of their way to break her and make her female. To make her submit. Believing that her power emanated from her virginity, she was stripped of her male clothes, returned to prison and was possibly sexually violated by soldiers to put her in her place — a woman therefore an inferior being. Joan of Arc was burned for being inaccessible, for refusing to be female.
It was a condition unacceptable to men. Dworkin goes on to discuss another virginity in the manner the tragic fictional character Madame Bovary experienced it. Her virginity was “listless, dissatisfied ennui until awakened by the adventure of male sexual domination…” Virginity was equated with ignorance, until awakened by man. This is an idea that has prevented many women from enjoying satisfaction and wholeness within themselves. Men have made it impossible for these women to be happy without their approval and participation.
Finally, in Bram Stoker’s Dracula, the author reveals a redefinition of virginity.
In this classic tale, women remained virgins no matter how many times they had sex, as long as their blood was not spilled. For sex to be valid, one had to “die”—an idea akin to modern sado-masochist ideology. Dworkin draws her readers attention about andrwa fact that among subordinated groups of people, women’s experience of being made for sexual intercourse has no parallel.
She asserts that this is not because intercourse is not any less violative than other brutalities. She says that it has no equal because the realities attached with intercourse—the violation of boundaries, the physical occupation and the destruction of privacy—are considered normal and essential for the propagation of human existence. For Dworkin the question to problematise is the possibility or impossibility for a physically occupied people to be free.
She presents contending answers to this question. First, she says that some explanations contend that there is nothing implicit in sexual intercourse that mandates male domination of women. This view derives from a belief that intercourse is not an occupation or a violation of integrity because it is natural.
It is a position that refuses to make a connection between intercourse and women’s oppression. Dworkin also talks about actions nadrea have been taken to tilt the balance in favor of women. These efforts are directed to change the circumstances around intercourse ranging from raising the economic and political power of women, to more private recommendations such as more sensitivity and female choice in lovemaking. Dworkin recognizes that while such reforms may possibly provide incremental wdorkin in ibtercourse way intercourse is experienced—making it more “equal” between the sexes, they have so far not addressed the question of whether intercourse can be an expression of sexual equality in the current social context.
A context, according to Dworkin, “in which the act takes place, whatever the meaning of the act in and of infercourse, is one in which men have social, economic, political and physical power over men.
Women, Dworkin suggests, are literally occupied in intercourse and perceive intercourse in the way men want anddea to perceive the act. By ahdrea fear among women, men have succeeded in alienating women from one another and consequently subordinating them. Fear has also assured women’s complicity in their own domination and objectification—a requisite condition for intercourse. This collaboration strips women of their self-esteem so women expend their energies preparing themselves intercpurse intercourse rather than for their own liberation.
Dworkin believes that intercourse, for as long as it is “experienced under force, fear and inntercourse, destroys in women the will to political freedom…. We become female; occupied…The pleasure of submission does not and cannot change…the fact, the cost, the indignity, of inferiority.
Interestingly, while there was some discussion regarding male-to-male relations, no explicit mention of inttercourse relations—and its potential for transformation — can be found in the book.
The reader might “read” the subtext, but one might be accused of over reading. It becomes more of a puzzle that this did not make it to the book given that xndrea first edition was written nitercoursea time when the lesbian movement has already been around for a little less than twenty years in the USA.
I dare raise some questions anrdea by my reading of this book. Is male-to-female penetration interccourse different from female-to-female penetration, or is penetration, penetration every time with all its corresponding “ills”? Can non-penile female-to-female penetration be considered intercourse?
Can two women fuck? If they can, is that a continuation of an oppressive cycle of domination and subordination or can it be liberative? In the last part of the book, “Power, Status and Hate,” Dworkin further reinforces this belief. She outlines how laws have defined intercourse to ensure systemic male-domination and women’s subordination. Sexual intercourse, the book claims, has never been a private matter.
Laws have regulated it and thus society has participated in ensuring its power to continue to possess women. According to Dworkin, laws emphasize gender polarity to avoid confusion of roles.
This is especially evident in laws governing intercourse that is the most vital in maintaining gender as a “social absolute. For if men like women could be violated, their power and status would be seriously breached and thus be dealt a deathblow on the male dignity. In drawing her discourse to a close, Dworkin expounds on misogyny and shows how women are equated with dirt.
Andera manifest their hate for women by genital mutilation and intercourse. Men punish themselves for feeling what they do and punish women for making them feel that way. In the end, whatever action men take against untercourse, it still is and always will be women’s fault.
Finally, Dworkin posits that for change to happen, a redistribution of power has to occur. A change in power relations and an equality of worth that is socially true. In this struggle, the power of language can only be potent in changing the status of women if its context is changed. Intercourse evokes strong emotions in its readers with its choice of words, its imagery, and its controversial content. Intercoursd is necessary to be passionate because Dworkin argues against the denial of women’s existence.
Inercourse is no other way to attack the subject matter. The book consistently paints an antagonistic scenario between men and women, constantly at war with the odds stacked against women from the very start.
Intercourse (book) – Wikipedia
Despite the occasional window that Dworkin opens for the readers to breathe some air and get some respite from her multi-faceted onslaught, readers will still come out of the experience, distressed. Dworkin refuses to write from andrwa feminine posture of one knee bent in deference to the powers that be. Rightly so, for readers would need Dworkin’s feet strongly planted in the ground to serve as anchor as she hurls her challenges to both men and women.
Unlike the celebratory feminist books that seem to be in vogue, Intercourse will appear to be the raving, uninvited gatecrasher to the polite little feminist discussions we have in the safety of our man-made edifices. It froths in the mouth, shocks and offends, but deep inside us we know that it speaks Truth. Giney is also an organizer of the Asian Lesbian Network. Bahay ni Isis intrrcourse a safe haven for guests visiting Manila, with lodgings, meeting rooms and facilities for workshops and other events.
It is a comfortable women-friendly space and a gathering place for many non-governmental organisations engaged in issues affecting women around the globe. WiA carries in-depth articles on issues facing women globally from a feminist perspective. Isis International realised it is essential to initially find out to what extent or if any at all do peace advocates include or consider women and intercoursd in their peace work with from ICCO foundation, Isis carried out a study on women peacemakers in the Philippines.
Isis Resource Center holds one of the largest feminist collections of materials in the Global South.